Schock pitches Social Security Fairness Act

Cites "inequities" in distributions

Tools

18th District Congressman Aaron Schock (R-IL) addresses people gathered at the Peoria Public Library Saturday morning. Schock was discussing the Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 23) that is currently stalled in Congress.

By Marc Strauss

Not everyone who contributes to social security gets to collect it. 18th district Congressman Aaron Schock doesn't think that's fair.

Schock talked about that this morning at the downtown branch of the Peoria Public Library where he was promoting the Social Security Fairness Act. In Congress its known as H–R 235 and its meant to protect public sector employees who may contribute to social security on a private sector job.

"As more and more individuals try to increase their household income(s) and a lot of public sector employees take on additional work, whether part-time on the weekends or in the evenings, they are paying into social security," Schock told News 25.

But because those people (such as public school teachers) have a full-time job with the government, the social security benefits they would receive from their part-time, private employment are reduced. Schock says that has to change.

"We’re not saying that anyone should draw from social security who hasn’t paid in. But if you have paid into social security and also work for the government, you should be provided some social security benefit for all of those years of paying in."

Schock says the bill has been stalled in Congress for several years now and is encouraging people to contact the office of House Ways and Means committee chairman Charlie Rengel (D-NY) to force a hearing. Rangel's office can be reached at (202) 225-4365 or people can send letters to him, addressed to Chairman Charlie Rangel, 2345 Rayburn HOB, Washington, DC, 20515.

Wednesday, Jun 24 at 7:02 PM Carmen Lange wrote ...

I am a retired teahcer after 31 years of service. I taught in the parochial schools for 8 years along with other jobs while I was completing my MA before entered the public school system. Even though I did not get paid all that much in the religious schools I though I would receive some of the money back in SS benefits when I retired. How fair is fair, now really! I was a AFT building rep and now I hear they want to make some kind of proposal to allow the state to borrow some of our money???

Wednesday, Jun 3 at 11:56 AM A Public School Teacher wrote ...

Oh, and yes, I too wonder why my spouse, who has worked for over 30 years, will not be able to collect on my full benefits, yet a spouse who has NEVER worked can.

Wednesday, Jun 3 at 11:54 AM A Public School Teacher wrote ...

I just learned about this today and I am 100% shocked! How can I not collect on all of the money I paid into SS for over 20 years before I took up teaching 2 years ago? Right now, I teach in one of the most dangerous neighborhoods of Chicago. And, yet I don't deserve all the money that I have paid into either the TRS or SS? Right. Maybe I should just put out 75% effort with my students. That should make it right.

Tuesday, Jun 2 at 5:31 PM bonnie wrote ...

Congress should pass the SS Fairness Act. The GPO/WEP is unfair. Foreigners can draw SS without ever paying a dime into it. FED employees should get SS they are entititled to.

Tuesday, May 26 at 6:21 PM chuckster wrote ...

It's nice to hear SOMEONE speaking out on this topic. Many politicians give this lip service, but zero action. The current policy is sooooooo unfair. The Illinois pols will NOT get another vote until this comes to the floor for an actual vote.

Tuesday, Apr 28 at 1:25 PM bill..chgo. wrote ...

as a young family man i contributed that sizeable am't to TRS but i worked many other jobs to raise a family...we blamed ROSTENKOWSKI in the beginning and since many other pols have benefitted from thrir own windfall(double dipping into public pensions)latest is SENATOR BURRIS...my benefit,my money was cut 2/3...this is wrong and now they want to change our TRS laws.they cheat us and manipulate the law.i will go to springfield May 6th

Monday, Apr 27 at 1:23 PM me wrote ...

It doesn't seem fair that my husband will receive an annuity when I die from my pension but I can't receive anything from his SS when he dies. Also, there are wives receiving SS benefits from their husband's SS who have never worked, but just because I worked for the government, I cannot receive anything from my husband's SS. Is this fair?

Tuesday, Apr 21 at 7:30 PM NJP wrote ...

Social Security Windfall? I worked 26 years. I worked various jobs, returned to school because I wanted to teach, and enjoyed teaching 9 years in private school,where I also paid into social security and then in public school where I paid into the Teachers Retirement System. Now I am receiving $860 monthly for my TRS retirement. I contacted TRS about the windfall reduction in my SS benefits by 2/3,=about $175/month. Should this be a windfall? Is it fair?

Friday, Apr 10 at 8:16 PM JE wrote ...

If everyone currently drawing social security benefits would have their checks direct deposited, it would save social security 25 million dollars a year in envelopes and stamps. This information came from an aide for Congressman Shock of Illinois. This aide worked for social security for 2 years prior to becoming Shock's aide. If anyone knows what they are talking about,I would think it would be a former employee of social security. Wake up politicians and make everyone direct deposit!!!!

Tuesday, Apr 7 at 8:32 PM jason k wrote ...

I suffer from 2 ilness'es an im told that i cant work because of it. SSI tells me i can work a medium duty job. Who am i suppose to believe, my 8 doctor's that ive been seeing for the last 1-1/2 yrs or there doctor that hasent seen me at all.

Sunday, Apr 5 at 12:54 PM Shirley Evers wrote ...

Because I worked for the State of Illinois and have a small retirement, the Social Security amount I receive from my deceased husband's account is decreased. This is not fair under any circumstance when there are women receiving benefits from their husbands who have never worked during their lifetime. There is something wrong with this system and it does need to be amended so that we who have a state retirement are not penalized for working and those who never worked are receiving benefits.

Friday, Apr 3 at 2:32 PM M.Gerry wrote ...

SS is beginning to face funding problems, BUT recipients should be treated fairly. If gov't workers cannot receive full payment then workers who receive pension bonuses or stock options or ANY retirement funds greater than a to-be-determined amount SHOULD NOT RECEIVE SS payments. Ex. business worker retires receives $100,000s in retirement amount(ANY type)...that worker should not get SS, or at least limited. This would make gov't past-employees not the only people to be FINED for EXTRA WORK..

Friday, Apr 3 at 12:12 PM Pat wrote ...

One additional category hurt by the SS offset is those of us who have had other careers prior to becoming teachers. Full witholding was removed from my income for 20 years, however, I cannot now collect that full benefit I paid in from my own 20 year full-time career. Every worker, public or private, can only draw in proportion to what he/she paid, I only want my fair proportion of all that I have earned. I have paid dearly in SS and have earned some TRS as well, why should I be penalized?!

Thursday, Apr 2 at 9:02 AM YM wrote ...

If you teach full time in IL after teaching in a state that pays into SS, you also lose most of your SS. Mine was reduced to $200 a month!

Tuesday, Mar 31 at 2:37 PM dmereh wrote ...

Social Social would be fair & solvent if NON-working spouses did NOT get checks ... they're NOT "RETIRING." Non-workers don't get unemployment, disability, or workman's comp ... why do they get Soc Sec? A NON-working spouse who gets $1,000/month for 20 yrs. will get $240,000 WITHOUT PAYING IN A PENNY!! That's not fair to single or married workers! Write & email Congress & Obama to correct this ... it's another "BAILOUT!"

Monday, Mar 30 at 9:16 PM J. B. wrote ...

I worked more than 20 years at the same part time job while teaching in order to make ends meet. I have no complaints about that. However, I paid SS for those 20 years but now can collect only 40% of what I might be eligible for if I had not been teaching as my primary job. In my best middle school vernacular, "That sucks!"

Sunday, Mar 29 at 8:39 PM Shannon wrote ...

I pay taxes for schools and have no children. (that is fine with me) Life isn't always fair. Anonymous - I don't believe the people who say they make as much or more on unemployment but some do make more than the minimum wage work that may be available. It just depends on what they made before they became unemployed.

Sunday, Mar 29 at 9:09 AM mimi wrote ...

think the goverment has bigger fish to fry than worry about this

Saturday, Mar 28 at 10:45 PM Annonymous wrote ...

It's not anybodys problem until the SS or SSI money is depleted. Agreeable there are people who deserve it, and need it, that is one thing, but there are a lot who don't need it. If you have been reading your yearly SS information you will notice that by 2040, the percent anyone will be able to collect, predicted will be much lower than now, money is running out. Everyone who pays in deserves their full credit, as any who is not able to work. Lets help each other, not take what we can

Saturday, Mar 28 at 7:00 PM Annonymous wrote ...

sounds like we have a bunch of ball babies here people grow up and leave people alone if they need to draw SSI or SS let them it is not your problem you sounds like you all have problems worry about other people

Saturday, Mar 28 at 6:54 PM Walter Hoaglun wrote ...

It only seems fair if we can bail out wall street and the banks and the auto motive companies, we should be able to allow people that paid into the system to collect S.S. to the degree that they paid into it.

Saturday, Mar 28 at 6:00 PM Chillicothe wrote ...

There are also people of collect SSI Disablity who are not disabled and are functional people. I think that if our government reviewed eveyone on SS disability that they would discover people receiving benefits that shouldn't and would be able to save Medicare!!!

Saturday, Mar 28 at 3:48 PM Al Beck wrote ...

Would be nice to have a Representative who understood things. W pushed the IOU's to Social Security under the table when he 'refunded' money in 01. Only a short time ago Schock was complaining about the deficit!

Saturday, Mar 28 at 3:03 PM Annonymous wrote ...

There are also a lot of people who work for cash and do not claim it, they are not taxed on this money. They have extra income, are not taxed, and draw unemployment while doing so. Hopefully these individuals do not collect SS when they are able to draw, or not as much, when they do not pay into SS weekly, as I do. There are too many people on unemployment who could work but do not like the pay jobs offer. It bothers me when I hear "I make as much or more on unemployment." (how can this be?)

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

WEEK News 25 - and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

More Good Stuff

Advertisement
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

Stock Quotes

What's On TonightFull Schedule

Local Business Dir